<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fideliphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fideliphone.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fideliphone.com</link>
	<description>High Fidelity Internet Telephony</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Announcing Fideliphone 1.0 Public Beta by Michal Vanduser</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta/comment-page-1#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Vanduser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I will say this is a great written article.Could it be possible to place a link on my site back here? I can link back with &quot; Announcing Fideliphone 1.0 Public Beta « Fideliphone and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta&lt;/a&gt; &quot; ? We could possibly become affiliated or partnered. You know, help each other out if we desire some. If you want to you can visit my site and comment to let me read what you think. Here&#039;s my site: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brushwrites.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Article Writing Tips&lt;/a&gt; . We focus on all sorts of topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say this is a great written article.Could it be possible to place a link on my site back here? I can link back with &#8221; Announcing Fideliphone 1.0 Public Beta « Fideliphone and <a href="http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta" rel="nofollow">http://www.fideliphone.com/announcing-fideliphone-1-0-public-beta</a> &#8221; ? We could possibly become affiliated or partnered. You know, help each other out if we desire some. If you want to you can visit my site and comment to let me read what you think. Here&#8217;s my site: <a href="http://www.brushwrites.com/" rel="nofollow">Article Writing Tips</a> . We focus on all sorts of topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by Simon Jaeger</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Hey. Sorry about not getting back to you sooner, i completely forgot to che3ck back here.

The problem does not happen with preview 7. That version remains generally reliable as it always has. I have all of the necessary ports opened, and i&#039;ve switched rapidly between preview 7 and the latest beta. So I know it&#039;s a beta-specific problem. I definitely have the right IP addresses, and they tend not to change unless the computer name changes as well. So internal network stuff should be working as well, even though it&#039;s not. The firewall is not causing the problem either, since I told it to unblock fideliphone the first time I used it.

I&#039;m also having serious lag problems at times, sometimes up to four seconds. I left the default jitter size, as did the other person. So I&#039;m not sure what the problem is. Maybe you have managed to get to the bottom of it at this point, I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Sorry about not getting back to you sooner, i completely forgot to che3ck back here.</p>
<p>The problem does not happen with preview 7. That version remains generally reliable as it always has. I have all of the necessary ports opened, and i&#8217;ve switched rapidly between preview 7 and the latest beta. So I know it&#8217;s a beta-specific problem. I definitely have the right IP addresses, and they tend not to change unless the computer name changes as well. So internal network stuff should be working as well, even though it&#8217;s not. The firewall is not causing the problem either, since I told it to unblock fideliphone the first time I used it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also having serious lag problems at times, sometimes up to four seconds. I left the default jitter size, as did the other person. So I&#8217;m not sure what the problem is. Maybe you have managed to get to the bottom of it at this point, I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Hi Tomecki,

Was my answer about jitter correction helpful to you?  Ihave been thinking about ways to improve the automatic jitter correction, especially right after the connection is established, before Fideliphone has had time to really get good information about the stability of the connection.  There may be some changes to the jitter buffer before Fideliphone 1.0 is officially released to try to shorten the delays.

Thanks,
Chris Peterson,
Fideliphone development team leader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tomecki,</p>
<p>Was my answer about jitter correction helpful to you?  Ihave been thinking about ways to improve the automatic jitter correction, especially right after the connection is established, before Fideliphone has had time to really get good information about the stability of the connection.  There may be some changes to the jitter buffer before Fideliphone 1.0 is officially released to try to shorten the delays.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Peterson,<br />
Fideliphone development team leader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon,

One question I think I forgot to ask you in my last response is: does this same type of connection problem occur with Fideliphone Preview 7?

I got a report from another user reporting connection problems over the weekend and we&#039;re trying to get to the bottom of it, so any additional information you think might be helpful would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Chris Peterson,
Fideliphone development team leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon,</p>
<p>One question I think I forgot to ask you in my last response is: does this same type of connection problem occur with Fideliphone Preview 7?</p>
<p>I got a report from another user reporting connection problems over the weekend and we&#8217;re trying to get to the bottom of it, so any additional information you think might be helpful would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Peterson,<br />
Fideliphone development team leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon,

When someone places a call with Fideliphone, it sends a connection request every 6 seconds.  It also plays a ringing sound to let you know that it&#039;s doing that.

The question is, why is that connection request not getting to the remote computer?  There are lots of things that could be causing this.  The simplest test would be to check whether Windows firewalls are turned on on one or both computers.  Windows firewalls will sometimes block traffic on local networks, and it&#039;s possible that the connection request is beingblocked by a firewall.

Next, try opening a command prompt on both computers and typing ipconfig.  Compare the ip addresses that ipconfig gives you with the addresses you&#039;ve set in Fideliphone.  If your local network is using dhcp to assign ip addresses, and most networks are by default, then it&#039;s possible that one or both computer&#039;s ip addresses have changed, especially if they&#039;ve been restarted.  In that case, Fideliphone might be trying to connect to the wrong address.  The caller will still hear a ringing sound, but the callee wouldn&#039;t ever hear a ring because the connection requests aren&#039;t getting there.  The simplest fix for this would be to change the ip address in your Fideliphone connection profile.

If neither of these causes seem to help, let me know and I&#039;ll try to come up with more suggestions.  If you notice anything that you think might be causing this, feel free to suggest it.  Also, if  there is anything unique about the networks you&#039;re having this problem on, let me  know that too.  Any detail might help us to get to the bottom of your problem faster.

Hope that helps,
Chris Peterson
Fideliphone development team leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon,</p>
<p>When someone places a call with Fideliphone, it sends a connection request every 6 seconds.  It also plays a ringing sound to let you know that it&#8217;s doing that.</p>
<p>The question is, why is that connection request not getting to the remote computer?  There are lots of things that could be causing this.  The simplest test would be to check whether Windows firewalls are turned on on one or both computers.  Windows firewalls will sometimes block traffic on local networks, and it&#8217;s possible that the connection request is beingblocked by a firewall.</p>
<p>Next, try opening a command prompt on both computers and typing ipconfig.  Compare the ip addresses that ipconfig gives you with the addresses you&#8217;ve set in Fideliphone.  If your local network is using dhcp to assign ip addresses, and most networks are by default, then it&#8217;s possible that one or both computer&#8217;s ip addresses have changed, especially if they&#8217;ve been restarted.  In that case, Fideliphone might be trying to connect to the wrong address.  The caller will still hear a ringing sound, but the callee wouldn&#8217;t ever hear a ring because the connection requests aren&#8217;t getting there.  The simplest fix for this would be to change the ip address in your Fideliphone connection profile.</p>
<p>If neither of these causes seem to help, let me know and I&#8217;ll try to come up with more suggestions.  If you notice anything that you think might be causing this, feel free to suggest it.  Also, if  there is anything unique about the networks you&#8217;re having this problem on, let me  know that too.  Any detail might help us to get to the bottom of your problem faster.</p>
<p>Hope that helps,<br />
Chris Peterson<br />
Fideliphone development team leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by Simon Jaeger</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-371</guid>
		<description>My friend and I are sometimes having an issue where fideliphone does not ring when it should, especially over local networks. The person placing a call hears a ring, but it does not seem to connect properly on the other end. I have no idea what could be causing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend and I are sometimes having an issue where fideliphone does not ring when it should, especially over local networks. The person placing a call hears a ring, but it does not seem to connect properly on the other end. I have no idea what could be causing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Hi Tomecki,

There are two ways to change the jitter buffer setting in Fideliphone.  The value in the settings -&gt; receive tab sets the default jitter buffer size for new connections.

There is another setting you can access by clicking the connection you want to change, then clicking &quot;edit settings&quot;.  This is the setting you should be changing.

The default value of 92 ms should usually be fine for most people.  On connections over our local area network, this seems to be about the size that Fideliphone settles down to after a few minutes.

Over the Internet, we notice that Fideliphone&#039;s latency goes up to around one second in the first 30 seconds, before gradually decreasing to a value similar to the latency you&#039;d see in Preview 7.  If you let Fideliphone run for several minutes, does the latency go down again, or does it stay at around 1 second?

There are other settings that will effect your audio latency.  In both the transmit and receive tabs of the settings window, there is an audio latency setting.  Fideliphone uses this setting as a guideline for setting the sizes of the buffers used to communicate with your sound card.  The default value is 200 ms, but you might notice better latency by decreasing this value to 50 or 100 ms.

Decreasing it too far will cause your computer to work harder, which will look to Fideliphone like higher network jitter, so if you&#039;ve decreased this value and you&#039;re actually noticing higher latency, try increasing it again and see if that helps.

Anyway, let me know if these suggestions help fix your problem and we&#039;ll decide where to go from there.

Thanks,
Chris Peterson,
Fideliphone development team leader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tomecki,</p>
<p>There are two ways to change the jitter buffer setting in Fideliphone.  The value in the settings -> receive tab sets the default jitter buffer size for new connections.</p>
<p>There is another setting you can access by clicking the connection you want to change, then clicking &#8220;edit settings&#8221;.  This is the setting you should be changing.</p>
<p>The default value of 92 ms should usually be fine for most people.  On connections over our local area network, this seems to be about the size that Fideliphone settles down to after a few minutes.</p>
<p>Over the Internet, we notice that Fideliphone&#8217;s latency goes up to around one second in the first 30 seconds, before gradually decreasing to a value similar to the latency you&#8217;d see in Preview 7.  If you let Fideliphone run for several minutes, does the latency go down again, or does it stay at around 1 second?</p>
<p>There are other settings that will effect your audio latency.  In both the transmit and receive tabs of the settings window, there is an audio latency setting.  Fideliphone uses this setting as a guideline for setting the sizes of the buffers used to communicate with your sound card.  The default value is 200 ms, but you might notice better latency by decreasing this value to 50 or 100 ms.</p>
<p>Decreasing it too far will cause your computer to work harder, which will look to Fideliphone like higher network jitter, so if you&#8217;ve decreased this value and you&#8217;re actually noticing higher latency, try increasing it again and see if that helps.</p>
<p>Anyway, let me know if these suggestions help fix your problem and we&#8217;ll decide where to go from there.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Peterson,<br />
Fideliphone development team leader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by Tomecki</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I tried to manipulate jitter correction but no changes between 1 and 1000 value. I tested this on real connection and 127.0.0.1. In local ip i have latency about 0.2s and in real connection start witch about 0.3 or 0.4 s and in about 30 seconds latency increase to about 0.8 or 1 second. In fideliphone preview 3 or 4 i have constant latency about 0.4 sec and if connection was stable, sound hasn&#039;t any delays or other errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to manipulate jitter correction but no changes between 1 and 1000 value. I tested this on real connection and 127.0.0.1. In local ip i have latency about 0.2s and in real connection start witch about 0.3 or 0.4 s and in about 30 seconds latency increase to about 0.8 or 1 second. In fideliphone preview 3 or 4 i have constant latency about 0.4 sec and if connection was stable, sound hasn&#8217;t any delays or other errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Fideliphone uses Portaudio, which does have asio support.  Steinburg has some odd licensing turms for asio and vst.  We need to understand them better before we can include asio and vst in Fideliphone official builds, but it&#039;s something we&#039;re thinking about.

Thanks,
Chris Peterson,
Fideliphone Development Team Leader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Fideliphone uses Portaudio, which does have asio support.  Steinburg has some odd licensing turms for asio and vst.  We need to understand them better before we can include asio and vst in Fideliphone official builds, but it&#8217;s something we&#8217;re thinking about.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Peterson,<br />
Fideliphone Development Team Leader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fideliphone 1.0.0-beta Reposted by Tomecki</title>
		<link>http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted/comment-page-1#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fideliphone.com/fideliphone-1-0-0-beta-reposted#comment-367</guid>
		<description>It Works! Thanks! and what about Asio in Fideliphone? for example bass, which support asio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It Works! Thanks! and what about Asio in Fideliphone? for example bass, which support asio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
